Sunday, August 28, 2011

Lecture 4. THE MONEY SUPPLY


LERNERIAN ECONOMICS 101

Although this course is labeled "Keynsian Economics", it could more accurately be labeled "Lernerian Economics" since it is based upon the work of Abba P.Lerner (1903- 1982), student of (and collaborator with) Keynes at the London School of Economics. On the economics faculty of Roosevelt College, Chicago (1947-1958), he developed the theory of "Functional Finance", explained by the following: (ref: Wikipedia) PRINCIPLES of FUNCTIONAL FINANCE • The principal economic objective of the state should be to ensure a prosperous economy. Governments have to intervene; the economy is not self-regulating. • Money is a creature of the state; it has to be managed. The amount and pace of government spending should be set in the light of the desired level of activity, and taxes should be levied for their economic impact, rather than to raise revenue. • Fiscal policy should be directed in the light of its impact on the economy, and the budget should be managed accordingly, that is, a ‘balanced budget’ is not important in itself. “Budget balancing” applies to households and businesses, but does not apply to the governments of sovereign states, capable of issuing money. RULES FOR FISCAL POLICY 1. The government shall maintain a reasonable level of demand at all times. If there is too little spending and, thus, excessive unemployment, the government shall reduce taxes or increase its own spending. If there is too much spending, the government shall prevent inflation by reducing its own expenditures or by increasing taxes. 2. By borrowing money when it wishes to raise the rate of interest and by lending money or repaying debt when it wishes to lower the rate of interest, the government shall maintain that rate of interest that induces the optimum amount of investment. 3. If either of the first two rules conflicts with the principles of balancing the budget, or of limiting the national debt, so much the worse for these principles. The government press shall print any money that may be needed to carry out rules 1 and 2.

AIMING FOR THE GOLDILOCKS ECONOMY

Economies exist between two opposing threats: * Full employment, shortages, and inflation: an excess of money in the economy. * Unemployment, glut (excess inventory), and deflation: a shortage of money in the economy. A Goldilocks economy - not too hot, not too cold - can be achieved by a financial policy that would avoid these extremes by regulating the amount of money in the economy with a judicious choice of the methods described below. All that is required is political will. Currently, (mid-2011), deficit hawks (with support of half of the public) believe that removing money from the economy during a recession will increase employment by "raising confidence" - exactly the way George Washington's doctors removed "bad blood" from his veins to allow his body to gain strength. The central thesis of Lernerian theory is that the federal government should pursue a policy of full employment consistent with low inflation and sustainable debt in fulfillment of the basic requirements listed in Lecture 2.

Currency and Money Supply

Being sovereign, the government is the unique issuer of fiat currency. There is no physical limit to the amount it may issue. We do not have a gold currency standard that constricts our money supply. Money enters the economy by several means: 1. Government purchase of private assets. 2. Grants, benefits, and wages to individuals or private organizations. 3. On the open market, the Federal Reserve can purchase Treasury bonds and other securities from financial institutions. (The Bank of England has an excellent description of the term “quantitative easing”.) This money becomes available for investment but only if banks and investors are both willing. Since that depends upon their view of the economy, the policy is always viewed with doubt. The purchase also has the goal of lowering interest rates and stimulating more economic activity. 4. Commercial Banks can, by making loans, create credit accounts up to a multiple of their reserve funds. 5. Unless interest rates are close to zero, the Federal Reserve can reduce the rates to promote movement of money out of reserves. 6. An excess of exports over imports. This hasn’t happened since 1990. 7. Foreign purchases of domestic property, foreign tourism, etc. Also “repatriation” of foreign profits of domestic firms. Money is removed from the economy by several means: 1. Government sale of assets to individuals or corporations. 2. Taxes, fines, fees, etc. have that effect but are not enacted for that purpose. (It is interesting that, in a recession, the conservatives call for tax cuts to spur the economy. But, during prosperity with fear of inflation, they never call for tax increases to curb the growth and stop inflation.) 3. Among other open market transactions, the Federal Reserve sells Treasury bonds and notes to the public. This “tightens” the money supply and restricts the ability of banks to lend. 4. The Federal Reserve can raise interest rates, effectively impeding the money flow from reserves into the economy. 5. An excess of imports over exports. This is a side-effect of sending manufacturing jobs overseas. 6. Money transfers, such as domestic investment in foreign nations (This is how US jobs are shipped overseas!), corporations and individuals parking money in off-shore tax havens, money spent by army privates in a foreign pub or by generals bribing a tribal chief, tourism, etc. Thus, the money supply (and consumer purchasing power) grows or declines as a result of the difference between these two flows. To increase the flow of money into the economy, the in- flow must exceed the out-flow. In a recession, the federal government must accelerate spending relative to taxation. The federal budget must have a deficit - the larger the better to end the recession.

Maldistribution of Income and Wealth

To avoid recessions, an adequate money supply is not enough. The money must also be well distributed so that everyone can buy necessities. Maldistribution, for much of the population, is the same as a short money supply. Economists say that recessions are caused mainly by too much borrowing, spending, and debt. This is true but begs the question: why do people borrow? Obviously, they borrow because they need more than their income. But why should that happen during prosperity? Are salaries not high enough? For a large portion of the working population, salaries slowly lose the struggle with even minor inflation and the needs of a growing family. "Keeping up with the Jones family" takes its toll. Then, consumers spend less, producers produce less, and the downward spiral ends in a recession. When unions were strong and manufacturing was an important industry, such recessions were short and were overcome by inventory exhaustion and replenishment as well as by counter-cyclical acts of government. People paid off their debts, started buying again, and prosperity returned. And the cycle could begin again. But with the export of manufacturing jobs, the consumer lost the battle. Personal debt for much of the population has had a steep climb. Although national wealth has increased, it is not in the hands of many who are in debt. The booms are shorter and the busts are getting longer. Our present crisis started when Reagan successfully bribed the voters with their own taxes: beer and cigarette money for the vast majority and vast wealth for a small minority. Since that severe blow to progressive taxation, ten percent of the US annual income has been redistributed from the bottom 80% of households to the top one percent of households. Now, the middle class is being decimated and infrastructure investment has been put on a starvation diet. Household Debt vs Disposable Income ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ START OF PERSONAL DEBT DEBACLE Reagan also put America in hock with lax enforcement of the 1979 NAFTA free trade agreement, matching US salaries against coolie wages without consideration for working conditions, pension and health benefits, or environmental standards. To avoid or recover from a recession, the economy's money supply must be both adequate and distributed well enougn to enable the vast majority of the population to purchase essential needs. The late 1920s and the early 2000s were both periods of peak maldistribution of wealth and income. Now, 80% of the US population owns less than 10% of its wealth and income distribution is similarly distorted. There are really only two cures for this disease: * A return to the pre-Reagan tax rates, including steep estate tax rates. There is no reason children of the rich should inherit more political power (which comes with the cash and begets more cash and more power, etc.) than children of the poor. * A policy of renewing domestic manufacturing and the consequent restructuring of the trade balance, as described by John B. Judis in The New Republic magazine. Such renewal cannot occur without massive investment in US infrastructure to give us technological advantages over competition.

Proceed to: Lecture 5. DEFICITS AND THE DEBT RATIO


Thanks for your interest. Marvin Sussman, retired engineer If you don’t like the world as it is, change it this way!:
1. Depress the Shift Key, sweep the cursor over the following URL, click, copy, and paste it on email to friends, and ask them to do the same: Keynesian Economics 101 The ONLY way out of this mess Free lectures on-line: KeynesForum.blogspot.com
2. To print and distribute single-sheet “invitations” to this site, click here and ask your friends to do the same.
3. To donate toward advertising this website, click the yellow “Donate” button below. You will be asked for your PayPal account password. If you don't have a PayPal account, you will need a credit card.
And ask your friends to do the same.
Copyright © 2011 Marvin Sussman All rights reserved.

No comments:

Post a Comment